Negotiation
Recruitment Fees And The Budget Behind An Offer
Agency fees are usually a percentage of the starting salary paid by the employer, which links the recruiter's income to your offer and shapes the budget it comes from.

An offer made through an agency carries a cost the candidate never sees. Understanding where that cost sits explains several otherwise puzzling features of the negotiation.
Who pays the recruiter
In contingency recruitment the hiring employer pays a fee on a successful placement, usually calculated as a proportion of the first-year salary. The candidate pays nothing.
That structure means the recruiter's income rises with the offer. On the face of it, the recruiter's interest and the candidate's interest point the same way.
The alignment is partial. A recruiter is paid only if a placement completes, so a slightly lower offer that closes is worth more than a higher one that collapses.
The fee comes out of a different budget
Salary is an ongoing cost carried by a department's payroll line. The agency fee is a one-off cost, often carried centrally by a recruitment or human resources budget.
Because they sit in different places, they are approved by different people under different limits. A hiring manager may control the salary but not the fee, or the reverse.
This is part of why an employer can be immovable on salary while agreeing readily to a signing payment or a start-date concession. The constraint is which budget is being asked.
Why the total cost changes the internal argument
An employer comparing candidates compares total acquisition cost, not just salary. A direct applicant carries no fee, and that difference is visible in the approval paperwork.
A candidate introduced by an agency therefore has to clear a slightly higher bar, or the salary has to come in slightly lower, for the same total to be reached.
None of this is hidden from the employer, and it is not misconduct. It is simply a cost line that exists in one route to hire and not another.
What a recruiter can and cannot tell you
A recruiter usually knows the salary band, the internal comparators and how flexible the employer has been in previous rounds. That information is genuinely valuable.
They are also acting for the employer, who is paying them. Anything disclosed to a recruiter should be assumed to reach the employer, including a candidate's stated minimum.
The useful posture is to treat a recruiter as a well-informed intermediary with their own interest, rather than as an adviser. Questions about process and comparators are answered readily.
Rebate periods and early departures
Agency terms commonly include a rebate if the placed candidate leaves within a defined early period. The employer recovers part of the fee.
That clause gives the recruiter a stake in the placement lasting, which is why briefings before a start date often become noticeably more attentive than they were during the search.
It also explains occasional pressure to accept quickly and settle in quietly. The commercial clock behind the process is running on terms the candidate has never seen.
Questions readers ask
Should I use an external offer as leverage?
It works and it carries risk — some employers match, some accelerate your departure, and being seen as a flight risk can affect future opportunities. Only do it if you would accept the offer.
How much should I ask for?
A figure supported by market evidence for the role as it now exists. Asking for a percentage without a reference point invites a percentage-shaped refusal.





