Rights at Work
Exempt Or Nonexempt: The Test That Decides Overtime
Whether overtime is owed depends on a classification test involving how someone is paid and what they actually do, not on job title or salaried status.

Overtime obligations turn on whether a role is classified as exempt or nonexempt. The classification is decided by tests applied to the job, and being salaried is only one part of one test.
Salary alone does not create an exemption
The most common misunderstanding is that paying someone a salary removes any overtime obligation. Salaried treatment is generally necessary for most exemptions but is not sufficient on its own.
Additional conditions apply, typically including a minimum salary level and a requirement that the duties performed fit a defined category. Failing either condition leaves the role nonexempt.
A nonexempt salaried employee is still owed overtime for hours beyond the threshold. The salary covers the straight-time portion rather than unlimited hours.
Duties are assessed on what the person actually does
The duties element examines the real content of the work rather than the description in a job posting. Titles are not determinative and cannot create an exemption by themselves.
Categories generally recognized include executive, administrative and professional work, along with certain outside sales and computer roles. Each has its own defined criteria.
Where someone spends most of their time on routine tasks while holding a managerial title, the classification is vulnerable. The test looks at primary duties, not at organizational charts.
Thresholds and criteria change over time
Salary thresholds are periodically revised, and revisions reclassify roles that previously sat above the line. Employers respond by raising pay or by converting positions to nonexempt.
State rules may impose stricter requirements than federal ones, and where they do, the more protective rule generally governs. This produces real differences between states.
Because both layers change, a classification that was correct several years ago may not be correct now. Periodic review is the employer's responsibility.
Misclassification creates liability, not just a correction
When a role is classified as exempt and should not have been, unpaid overtime for the worked period may be owed. Records of hours become central, and they often do not exist for exempt staff.
Claims are subject to time limits that vary and that can extend where conduct is found to be willful. The limits are one reason to raise a concern promptly.
Remedies and procedures differ by jurisdiction, so anyone who believes they have been misclassified should seek advice from a labor agency or an employment attorney rather than relying on general descriptions.
Some occupations sit outside the general framework
Certain industries operate under their own rules on hours and overtime, including some transportation, agricultural and seasonal work. The general framework does not apply uniformly.
Public sector employment also has distinct provisions, including arrangements for compensatory time that private employers generally cannot use.
Anyone in one of these sectors should check the specific provisions rather than assuming the standard rules. The exceptions are numerous and narrowly drawn.
Questions readers ask
Who do I chase when agency pay is late?
The agency, in writing. First check the timesheet was submitted and approved by the client, since approval failures cause most delays. The client not paying the agency is not your problem.
Why is my net pay so much lower than the quoted rate?
Some intermediary arrangements deduct fees and employment costs before gross pay. Ask for a written gross to net illustration before accepting any assignment.
Also by Tobias Lindholm
- What a salary actually costs an employerPay & Payslips
- Why a bonus looks brutally taxed in the month it landsPay & Payslips
- Why a pay rise moves your take-home by less than you expectedPay & Payslips
- What each deduction line on a payslip actually fundsPay & Payslips





